Prestressing as action or resistance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load) | There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load) | ||
== Prestressing as resistance == | |||
* Considers the prestressing strands as integral part of the cross section, where prestressing operation introduces imposed deformation corresponding the pre-elongation of the active reinforcement. | |||
* Hyperstatic effects must be considered. | |||
== Prestressing as action == | |||
* Considers prestressing as external loading consisting of a self-equilibrating system of forces in the anchorages and the transversally in the concrete. After transfer prestressing strands are considered as conventional reinforcement, only taking into consideration the pre-elongation. | |||
== Treatment in different codes == | == Treatment in different codes == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 20: | ||
* Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance | * Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance | ||
== References == | |||
* M. B. Cavalcanti, B. Horowitz: [http://revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riem/article/viewFile/53/39 Flexural Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures], IBRACON Structures and materials journal, Volume 1, Number 4 (December, 2008) p. 331 - 364, ISSN 1983-4195 - describes two methods that can be used to evaluate capacity of prestressed concrete members; method 1 treats prestressing as integral part of the section, while method 2 treats prestressing as external load. | |||
{{Prestressed Concrete}} | {{Prestressed Concrete}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 20 April 2009
There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load)
Prestressing as resistance
- Considers the prestressing strands as integral part of the cross section, where prestressing operation introduces imposed deformation corresponding the pre-elongation of the active reinforcement.
- Hyperstatic effects must be considered.
Prestressing as action
- Considers prestressing as external loading consisting of a self-equilibrating system of forces in the anchorages and the transversally in the concrete. After transfer prestressing strands are considered as conventional reinforcement, only taking into consideration the pre-elongation.
Treatment in different codes
AASHTO LRFD 2007
- Based on C5.7.1, prestressing is treated as part of resistance
Eurocode 2 (1992)
- Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance
References
- M. B. Cavalcanti, B. Horowitz: Flexural Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures, IBRACON Structures and materials journal, Volume 1, Number 4 (December, 2008) p. 331 - 364, ISSN 1983-4195 - describes two methods that can be used to evaluate capacity of prestressed concrete members; method 1 treats prestressing as integral part of the section, while method 2 treats prestressing as external load.
| Home > Topics > Prestressed Concrete e | |
| Overview | Overview · Hyperstatic forces |
| Prestress losses | Friction losses · Anchorage set losses |
| Miscellaneous | Tendon · Post-Tensioning · Partial prestressing · Restraint moment · Prestressing as action or resistance · Standard prestressed girders · Magnel diagram |
|
|
|
| Related Topics | Reinforced Concrete |