Prestressing as action or resistance: Difference between revisions

From StructuralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load)
There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load)
== Prestressing as resistance ==
* Considers the prestressing strands as integral part of the cross section, where prestressing operation introduces imposed deformation corresponding the pre-elongation of the active reinforcement.
* Hyperstatic effects must be considered.
== Prestressing as action ==
* Considers prestressing as external loading consisting of a self-equilibrating system of forces in the anchorages and the transversally in the concrete. After transfer prestressing strands are considered as conventional reinforcement, only taking into consideration the pre-elongation.


== Treatment in different codes ==
== Treatment in different codes ==
Line 11: Line 20:
* Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance
* Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance


== References ==
* M. B. Cavalcanti, B. Horowitz: [http://revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riem/article/viewFile/53/39 Flexural Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures], IBRACON Structures and materials journal, Volume 1, Number 4 (December, 2008) p. 331 - 364, ISSN 1983-4195 - describes two methods that can be used to evaluate capacity of prestressed concrete members; method 1 treats prestressing as integral part of the section, while method 2 treats prestressing as external load.


{{Prestressed Concrete}}
{{Prestressed Concrete}}

Latest revision as of 15:27, 20 April 2009

There are two distinct approaches to the design checks of prestressed concrete members - the prestressing can be either treated as resistance (integral part of the section) or as action (load)

Prestressing as resistance

  • Considers the prestressing strands as integral part of the cross section, where prestressing operation introduces imposed deformation corresponding the pre-elongation of the active reinforcement.
  • Hyperstatic effects must be considered.

Prestressing as action

  • Considers prestressing as external loading consisting of a self-equilibrating system of forces in the anchorages and the transversally in the concrete. After transfer prestressing strands are considered as conventional reinforcement, only taking into consideration the pre-elongation.

Treatment in different codes

AASHTO LRFD 2007

  • Based on C5.7.1, prestressing is treated as part of resistance

Eurocode 2 (1992)

  • Based on article 5.10.1, bullet 2, the effects of prestressing can be considered as an action or a resistance

References

  • M. B. Cavalcanti, B. Horowitz: Flexural Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures, IBRACON Structures and materials journal, Volume 1, Number 4 (December, 2008) p. 331 - 364, ISSN 1983-4195 - describes two methods that can be used to evaluate capacity of prestressed concrete members; method 1 treats prestressing as integral part of the section, while method 2 treats prestressing as external load.

 

Home > Topics > Prestressed Concrete e
Overview Overview  · Hyperstatic forces
Prestress losses Friction losses  · Anchorage set losses
Miscellaneous Tendon  · Post-Tensioning  · Partial prestressing  · Restraint moment  · Prestressing as action or resistance  · Standard prestressed girders  · Magnel diagram

      Related Topics Reinforced Concrete